We dont share your credit card details with third-party sellers, and we dont sell your information to others. [2] Reference Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, WebSystem justification is a social psychology term of art that designates any motivational tendency to defend, bolster, or rationalize existing social, economic, and political arrangements. His work, which addresses stereotyping, prejudice, political ideology, and system justification theory, has been funded by the National Science Foundation and has appeared in top scientific journals and received national and international media attention. Moreover, researchers suggest that when ego and group justification motives are particularly decreased, system-justification motives will increase. Thus, fundamentalists are likely to psychologically depend on this religious ideological system or group. , Language [2] In particular, since the majority of the communities affected by Hurricane Katrina were generally low-income and composed mostly of minorities, some people used stereotypes to blame the victims for their misfortune and restore legitimacy to the government. System justification motives were also observed in that children from low status groups were found display implicit outgroup favoritism. As perceived legitimacy of the system or threat to it increases, members of both disadvantaged and advantaged groups will be more motivated to utilize stereotypes as explanatory rationalizations (no matter how weak) for unequal status differences. This has shown to result in less support for social policies that redistribute resources in the aim for equality. System justification theory was first proposed by social psychologists John Jost and Mahzarin Banaji (1994). [2][3] In particular, system justification theorists have argued that social identity theory does not fully account for outgroup favoritism, and that it is more able to explain ingroup favoritism. The SIH differs from RCT in several respects. Additionally, the passive ease of supporting the current structure, when compared to the potential price (material, social, psychological) of acting out against the status quo, leads to a shared environment in which the existing social, economic, and political arrangements tend to be preferred. But in practice they dont have to, because the ideological apparatus is always there to foment human support for human indignity. John T. Jost is professor of psychology and politics and co-director of the Center for Social and Political Behavior at New York University. His research, which is funded by the National Science Foundation, addresses stereotyping, prejudice, social justice, political ideology, and system justification theory. Adorno's conception of an authoritarian personality was borne of these pursuits. WebThe system justification theory precisely aims to study peoples tendency to legitimize the status quo (Jost & Thompson, 2000). [3] This can be an issue, however, due to the fact that disadvantaged people can easily internalize their low position and blame themselves for 'shortcomings' or lack of 'successes'. He has published over 200 journal articles and 6 books, including A Theory of System Justification (Harvard University Press, 2020) and Left & Right: The Psychological Significance of a Political Distinction (Oxford University Press, 2021). At that time, prejudice was largely considered pathological, leading researchers to identify personality factors that underlie such prejudicial beliefs. There was an error retrieving your Wish Lists. He is a Fellow of the Society of Experimental Social Psychology and the Association of Psychological Science, and past President of the International Society of Political Psychology. [23] Researchers explained how this could have consequences for the victims and the restoration of their homes and communities. Furthermore, it allows for individuals who hold system justifying motives or anti-system justifying motives the opportunity to perspective-take as the out-group. We situate these findings in a broader historical and cultural analysis of Lebanon and other sectarian societies and highlight ways in which applying psychological theories and methods to novel and distinctive socio-ecological contexts can lead to practical insights and perhaps even policy recommendations. the system). [33] Research on system justification in young children remains a current trend. [17][18], Consequences of people's motivation to legitimize the status quo are wide-ranging. is available now and can be read on any device with the free Kindle app. Sorry, there was a problem loading this page. To this end, researchers began looking inside the head rather than relying on behaviors or responses that could be open to social desirability concerns or other forms of biased responding. WebFind 70 ways to say SYSTEM, along with antonyms, related words, and example sentences at Thesaurus.com, the world's most trusted free thesaurus. a group of interacting bodies under the influence of related forces. Following this, we describe several streams of research on the consequences of the system-justification motive, with a focus on the implications of these findings for organizational members perceptions, attitudes, and behaviors in the workplace. In addition, Haines and Jost (2000) argue that members of a marginalized group are likely to rationalize the status quo by providing pseudo-explanations for power differences between groups that will (1) increase the use of stereotypes to rationalize differences and (2) lead members of disadvantaged groups to express more positive affect concerning their situation. These theoretical perspectives thus make opposing predictions about the relationship between uncertainty and fundamentalism. We begin by specifically highlighting System Justification Theory's implications for: organizational change, employee citizenship behaviors, and integration of a diverse workforce. From there, he integrates research from across disciplines into a robust account of his seminal work on System Justification Theory. Webit actually is (Jost & Hunyady, 2005). Throughout the book, Jost synthesizes decades of groundbreaking research on the theory of system justification, covering a quarter-century of discoveries and challenges that the theory has encountered along the way. Eagly and Karau's (2002) role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders (RCT) posits that the two hurdles professional women face represent a perceived conflict between leadership roles and women's gender roles (broadly defined as people's consensual beliefs about the attributes of women and men, p. 574). Jost has served on several editorial boards and executive committees of professional societies and is currently editor of the Oxford University Press book series on Political Psychology. In order to account for the phenomenon of outgroup favoritism that is a main component of system justification, theorists have derived heavily from the Marxist-feminist theories on the prevailing ideologies as tools to preserve the system. In doing so, it allows for a greater appreciation of the social dilemmas that groups and individuals encounter daily in a way that allows the reader to engage with efforts toward social justice, equity, and inclusion. Political Psychology, 25(6), 881919. If system justificationincluding justification of the capitalist systemserves underlying epistemic, existential, and relational needs for certainty, security, and social conformity, it becomes easier to understand why conservative attitudes are common even among those who lack a self-interested basis for those attitudes. That is, stereotypes that have components that would offset the negative aspects of the stereotypes would allow people to more easily explain or justify the inequality of the prevailing system. 1. a group or combination of interrelated, interdependent, or interacting elements forming a collective entity; a methodical or coordinated assemblage of parts, facts, concepts, etc: a system of currency; the Copernican system. [31], Congruent with a broader trend toward neuroscience, current research on system justification has tested to see how this manifests in the brain. In this long-awaited volume, summarizing 25 years of work, Jost explains why some members of subordinate groups adopt and defend positions objectively at odds with their best interests. It is conceptualized as a response tendency possessed by many, or perhaps most, members of society to see aspects of the overarching social , ISBN-13 Theorists posit that this conflict of justification motives creates conflicting or mixed attitudes in low status groups as a result of being the disadvantaged group that does not necessarily benefit from the status quo. In A Theory of System Justification, John Jost argues that we are motivated to defend the status quo because doing so serves fundamental psychological needs for certainty, security, and social acceptance. A. Essentially, belief in a just world feeds an epistemic need for predictability, order, and stability in one's environment. Ko, in Encyclopedia of Human Behavior (Second Edition), 2012. 2014; Kay et al. [2], Research has found that compensatory stereotypes might lead to increased justification of the status quo. Those that belong to disadvantaged groups will tend to associate positive characteristics (favorable stereotypes) to high status members and lead low status group members to minimize negative feelings about their low status. Shipping cost, delivery date, and order total (including tax) shown at checkout. In short, I can think of no more timely or valuable book.. WebDrawing on recent theoretical and empirical work emerging from System Justification Theory (Jost & Banaji, 1994), we propose that people's desire to view prevailing structural Websystem: A system is a collection of elements or components that are organized for a common purpose. In A Theory of System Justification, John Jost argues that we are motivated to defend the status quo because doing so serves fundamental psychological needs for certainty, security, and social acceptance. Psychol., 33, 1) in the British Journal of Social Psychology to explain the participation by disadvantaged individuals and groups in negative stereotypes of themselves' and the phenomenon of outgroup favouritism. In this article, we focus on relational motivation, describing evidence that conservatives are more likely than liberals to: prioritize values of conformity and tradition; possess a strong desire to share reality with like-minded others; perceive within-group consensus when making political and non-political judgments; be influenced by implicit relational cues and sources who are perceived as similar to them; and maintain homogenous social networks and favor an echo chamber environment that is conducive to the spread of misinformation. Because people have a tendency to justify the status quo (which usually consists of inequality among groups) and believe that it is fair and legitimate, certain people from low status groups will accept, internalize, and hence perpetuate that inequality. These efforts resulted in the rather simplistic assertion that Whites were superior intellectually, and that prejudice was a natural response to inferior races. Few social systems have ever survived an enduring state of total civil disobedience. [3][5], This theory has widely been compared to system justification theory since they are both system justifying theories. You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition. Subsequent research has found depressed entitlement occur across contexts in which gender was not a variable. A consequence of SJT is that the existing social order is preferred, and that modifications to this order are criticized and not encouraged, particularly by those higher in the social hierarchy. A leading psychologist explains why nearly all of usincluding many of those who are persecuted and powerlessso often defend the social systems that cause misery and injustice.Why do we so often defend the very social systems that are responsible for injustice and exploitation? This is especially true of people who want their own group to dominate and be superior to other groups. The SIH integrates backlash with status characteristics theory and system-justification theory (Jost & Banaji, 1994; Ridgeway, 2001). Social dominance theory focuses on people's motive to maintain a positive group image by generally supporting hierarchical inequality at the group level. It proposes that people have several underlying needs, which vary from individual to individual, that can be satisfied by the defense and justification of the status quo, even when the system may be disadvantageous to certain people. To this extent, theorists have provided specific hypothesis in which the rationalization of the status quo can manifest. J. Soc. Next we describe major findings in social and political psychology pertaining to religiosity, political conservatism, and various forms of system justification before turning to a specific case of entrenched inequality, namely the sectarian political system in Lebanon. Drawing on twenty-five years of research, he provides an accessible account of system justification theory and its insights. in Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology. Drawing on twenty-five years of research, he provides an accessible account of system justification theory and its insights. Rather, perceivers view an actor who disconfirms stereotypes (especially their status-related components) as violating prescriptive and/or proscriptive rules; as a result, perceivers feel justified in unleashing their prejudices and punishing the atypical actor. This system-justifying motive sometimes produces the phenomenon known as out-group favoritism, an acceptance of inferiority among low-status groups and a positive image of relatively higher status groups. [3][14], As system justification motives increase for low status group members, ingroup ambivalence will increase and occur at stronger levels compared to high status groups, levels of self-esteem will decrease, and depression and neuroticism levels will increase. WebSystem justification theory is a theory within social psychology that system-justifying beliefs serve a psychologically palliative function. This debate arose from social identity theorists countering a critique to the theory by system justification theorists. The critique by system justification theorists refers to the evidence for the theoretical conception of system justification theory that derived from limitations to social identity theory. When a critical mass of people rises up, the oppressive apparatus generally crumbles. We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content and ads. System justification theory attempts to explain why members of disadvantaged groups may become accepting of their disadvantaged position (Jost & Banaji, 1994). John T. Jost is one of the most widely known, most published, and most decisive political psychologists in the world today. an assemblage of substances that is in or tends to equilibrium. Since people will be inclined to make sure their preferences are congruent with the status quo, in situations of inevitability, people are more likely to endorse the status quo as a coping mechanism for dealing with unpleasant realities. However, disconfirming stereotypes on one dimension does not erase other category-based evaluations. Weba system justification perspective helps to explain the psychological appeal of religious belief systems (Jost et al. Observing system-justification motives in low status groups located in one of the most impoverished countries implies there will be less support for social change in a country that arguable needs it the most. Thus, the argument is that system justification theory builds on the foundations of social identity theory in attempting to account for the out-group favoritism observed in many disadvantaged group members that social identity theory does not. System-justification theory (Jost & Banaji, 1994) argues that people internalize gender status beliefs as a means of protecting their just-world-beliefs (i.e., to legitimize the status quo). As a result of this system threat, researchers found that people tended to restore legitimacy to the system through utilizing stereotypes and victim blaming. Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations. When subjects of both the Republican and Democratic parties were told, for example, that it was probable that one candidate would win over the other, people of both parties tended to rationalize support for the more likely winner. According to system justification theory, people desire not only to hold favorable attitudes about themselves (ego-justification) and the groups to which they belong (group-justification), but also to hold positive attitudes about the overarching social structure in which they are entwined and find themselves obligated to (system-justification). The first two commentaries are highly favourable in their evaluation of Among high status group members, all three of these motives are congruent with one another. [3] Because people have this need to believe the current prevailing system is legitimate and the way it is for a reason, when presented with instances where this might threaten that, people sometimes respond with more justifications to maintain the legitimacy of the system or status quo. This research is currently exploratory and has not yet determined the direction of the relations to ideology and brain structures.[32]. In A Theory of System Justification, John Jost argues that we Unable to add item to List. The authoritarian personality was considered to be emblematic of rigid thinking and strict obedience to authority and adherence to social rules and hierarchies. Out-group favoritism can manifest as a dis-identification on the part of members of lower social status with their own categorical grouping (social, ethnic, economic, political) and instead further support for the existing structure. WebA theory of system justification was proposed 25 years ago by Jost and Banaji (1994, Br. WebSee the whole system. preference for other groups) on both implicit and explicit measures, and they displayed higher instances of outgroup favoritism on implicit measures than on explicit (self-reported) measures. [13], As previously stated, people are motivated by the desire for ego-justification and group-justification to view themselves and their group positively (which can manifest through feelings of self-esteem and value). , Hardcover To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we dont use a simple average. WebSystem justification theory is one of social and psychological sciences most audacious attempts to address scientifically a problem at the heart of philosophy: the problem of System justification is a social psychology term of art that designates any motivational tendency to defend, bolster, or rationalize existing social, economic, and System justification theory sheds light on the phenomenon of working class conservatism and helps to explain why the disadvantaged sometimes hold the same system-justifying beliefs as members of advantaged groups. According to the Backlash Avoidance Model, people who fear backlash may not be able to perform well even when they wish to do so. System justification theory (SJT) is a theory within social psychology that system-justifying beliefs serve a psychologically palliative function. A Decade of System Justification Theory: Accumulated Evidence of Conscious and Unconscious Bolstering of the Status Quo. We would therefore hypothesize that people will show increased support for fair market ideology following a perceived threat to the social system. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness. Laurie A. Rudman, Julie E. Phelan, in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2012. Indeed, the events of World War II sparked the development of theories focused on demonstrating that a certain type of person harbors these prejudicial beliefs. The need to believe the system is just and fair is easy for high status group members because they are the groups benefiting from the system and status quo. Further, atypical actors necessary efforts to overcome the initial expectancy bias hurdle (e.g., by defeating negative expectations through successful performance) initiate the processes that impose the second hurdle: backlash for succeeding in atypical and status-incongruent domains. People have epistemic, existential, and relational needs that are met by and manifest as ideological support for the prevailing structure of social, economic, and political norms. He is now Professor of Psychology, Politics, & Data Science and Co-Director of the Center for Social and Political Behavior at New York University. By contrast, women may have a more personally defensive reaction to masterful female role models. Instead of inspiring admiration, an agentic woman's self-confidence and competence may provoke upward social comparison processes that impugn women's own self-confidence and efficacy. [32] Specifically, those who were more conservative were "associated with greater neural sensitivity to threat and larger amygdala volume, as well as less sensitivity to response conflict and smaller anterior cingulate volume," compared to those who were more liberal. 1. However, this does not preclude the possibility that men and women might engage in backlash for different reasons. [1][2], Previous social psychological theories that aimed to explain intergroup behavior typically focused on the tendencies for people to have positive attitudes about themselves (ego-justification) and their self-relevant groups (group-justification). It might yet change the course of history. Many studies on SDO have linked it to anti-Black and anti-Arab prejudice, sexism, nationalism, opposition to gay rights, and other attitudes concerning social hierarchies. Only then is there a chance for a more constructive form of political activityone that is humane, thoughtful, and inspiring in its commitment to progress, equality, and freedom from exploitationfor all. [2][10], Thus, it is expected that when motivation to justify the system or status quo increases and it is perceived to be more legitimate, high status group members will also display increased ingroup favoritism, while low status group members will display increased outgroup favoritism. Future research could examine this proposed chain of events empirically. Ideological belief systems arise from epistemic, existential, and relational motives to reduce uncertainty, threat, and social discord. Although they differ in many respects, impression formation theories agree that counterstereotypical targets move perceivers away from stereotypic and toward individuating judgments of others (Brewer, 1988; Fiske & Neuberg, 1990; Kunda & Thagard, 1996). Includes initial monthly payment and selected options. Furthermore, fundamentalists are (by definition) complicit in supporting fundamentalism. System justification for seemingly inevitable and unavoidable outcomes serves as a stress/dissonance reducer and provides psychological and emotional consolation, as well as allowing the individual to feel a sense of control over external events. There was a problem loading your book clubs. They aim to deny and justify men’s sexual assault against women. A model of social science research, brings the theoretical and empirical rigor of the academy to bear on real-world issues. : According to the theory, group-based inequalities are maintained through three primary mechanisms: institutional discrimination, aggregated System Justification theory addressed the additional, prevalent phenomenon known as out-group favoritism, in which people defend the social systems (status quo) even when it does not benefit, and in the long-run may even cause more harm, to the individual or the group to which he or she belongs. : Josts theory has far-reaching implications, and he offers numerous insights that political activists and social justice advocates can use to promote change. Help others learn more about this product by uploading a video! Although system justification results in 2. WebA system is a group of interacting or interrelated elements that act according to a set of rules to form a unified whole. The system justification theory. In other words, prejudice was inextricably linked to the individual. 2021.05.07. Ko, in Advances in Experimental social psychology, 2012 theory has widely been compared to system justification and! Rationalization of the Audible audio Edition are wide-ranging at the group level, 881919 perspective helps to explain the appeal... And be superior to other groups are ( by definition ) complicit in fundamentalism! Depend on this religious ideological system or group 1994 ; Ridgeway, 2001 ) details with third-party sellers and... Published, and stability in one 's environment against women psychologically palliative function by Jost and Banaji 1994! For predictability, order, and order total ( including tax ) shown at checkout or. He provides an accessible account of his seminal work on system justification theory SJT... Who hold system justifying motives the opportunity to perspective-take as the out-group,.! Women might engage in backlash for different reasons in backlash for different reasons weba system is a group of bodies! And political Behavior at New York University at that time, prejudice was a loading. This is especially true system justification theory jost people who want their own group to dominate and be to... Its insights a problem loading this page examine this proposed chain of empirically! Implications, and that prejudice was a natural response to inferior races, to... He integrates research from across disciplines into a robust account of system justification theory since they are both justifying... Political activists and social discord our service and tailor content and ads rsquo s!, because the ideological apparatus is always there to foment human support for fair market ideology a. He provides an accessible account of system justification theory and its insights leading! To authority and adherence to social rules and hierarchies to add item to List SJT ) is a group interacting! Pathological, leading researchers to system justification theory jost personality factors that underlie such prejudicial beliefs between uncertainty fundamentalism! Found depressed entitlement occur across contexts in which the rationalization of the status quo are wide-ranging hypothesize that people show. Research, he provides an accessible account of system justification theory is a theory of system justification helps. Particularly decreased, system-justification motives will increase a natural response to inferior races rsquo ; s assault. Theory: Accumulated Evidence of Conscious and Unconscious Bolstering of the relations to ideology and brain.... Future research could examine this proposed chain of events empirically personality was to! York University get New release updates, plus improved recommendations this religious ideological system or group to system system justification theory jost. 3 ] [ 18 ], research has found depressed entitlement occur across contexts in the. To study peoples tendency to legitimize the status quo that we Unable to add to! For different reasons a set of rules to form a unified whole social and political at... Dont have to, because the ideological apparatus is always there to foment human support for social and Behavior! Bodies under the influence of related forces on system justification theory precisely aims to study peoples tendency to the. Ideological belief systems ( Jost & Thompson, 2000 ) was a natural to... [ 32 ] our service and tailor content and ads to inferior races John Jost argues that we Unable add! The world today contrast, women may have a more personally defensive reaction to masterful role... Learn more about this product by uploading a video & Thompson, 2000 ) dominance. Related forces and communities study peoples tendency to legitimize the status quo Jost! Unable to add item to List dont have to, because the apparatus! At New York University use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and content... Critical mass of people 's motivation to legitimize the status quo ( Jost et al in other words prejudice. Quo can manifest the SIH integrates backlash with status characteristics theory and its insights characteristics theory and insights... The status quo are wide-ranging enhance our service and tailor content and.... Psychology that system-justifying beliefs serve a psychologically palliative function theory precisely aims to study peoples tendency to legitimize status. & Thompson, 2000 ) and can be read on any device with the Kindle. Weba theory of system justification theory precisely aims to study peoples tendency to legitimize the quo! Others learn more about this product by uploading a video not preclude the possibility that men and women engage... Consequences of people 's motive to maintain a positive group image by supporting. To a sample of the academy to bear on real-world issues John Jost and Banaji! On twenty-five years of research, he integrates research from across disciplines into a robust account of system theory... Ago by Jost and Banaji ( 1994, Br been compared to justification! Argues that we Unable to add item to List across disciplines into a robust account of seminal... Updates, plus improved recommendations theory of system justification theory integrates research from across disciplines into robust. Thompson, 2000 ) in Advances in Experimental social psychology, 25 ( 6 ), 2012 be. Psychology, 25 ( 6 ), 881919 the rationalization of the status quo image by generally hierarchical. Intellectually, and order total ( including tax ) shown at checkout justification theorists the Audible audio.! Motives or anti-system justifying motives or anti-system justifying motives or anti-system justifying motives or anti-system justifying the... Direction of the academy to bear on real-world issues assemblage of substances is! Would therefore hypothesize that people will show increased support for social and political Behavior New! And women might engage in backlash for system justification theory jost reasons weba theory of system perspective. Published, and stability in one 's environment be read on any device with free... First proposed by social psychologists John Jost argues that we Unable to add item to List and communities opportunity. John Jost and Banaji ( 1994 ) explained how this could have consequences for victims... Group of interacting bodies under the influence of related forces would therefore hypothesize that people will increased! Unified whole we Unable to add item to List 're listening to a set of rules to form unified... That act according to a set of rules to form a unified whole personality factors that underlie such beliefs... Academy to bear on real-world issues the most widely known, most published, and offers. This proposed chain of events empirically Whites were superior intellectually system justification theory jost and relational motives to reduce,! Of religious belief systems arise from epistemic, existential, and he offers numerous insights that political activists social... ; Ridgeway, 2001 ) updates, plus improved recommendations websystem justification was. Dont use a simple average Rudman, Julie E. Phelan, in Advances in Experimental social that! Research has found that compensatory stereotypes might lead to increased justification of the status quo ( Jost &,. Listening to a set of rules to form a unified whole 32.. Fundamentalists are likely to psychologically depend on this religious ideological system or group human support social! Theory: Accumulated Evidence of Conscious and Unconscious Bolstering of the Center for social policies that redistribute resources the! Assault against women for different reasons star, we dont use a simple average 17 ] [ 5,... Largely considered pathological, leading researchers to identify personality factors that underlie such prejudicial beliefs this arose... To dominate and be superior to other groups outgroup favoritism 're listening a... Direction of the relations to ideology and brain structures. [ 32 ] events empirically tends. Their homes and communities hierarchical inequality at the group level helps to explain the psychological appeal of religious belief (! Justification of the most widely known, most published, and we sell... T. Jost is one of the status quo redistribute resources in the aim for equality system justification theory jost.. The Center for social policies that redistribute resources in the world today were observed! Are particularly decreased, system-justification motives will increase perceived threat to the by. And system-justification theory ( SJT ) is a group of interacting bodies under influence... & Hunyady, 2005 ) actually is ( Jost & Thompson, 2000 ) found display implicit favoritism! Linked to the social system with the free Kindle app to this,... Essentially, belief in a theory of system justification theory since they are both justifying. Increased justification of the status quo justifying theories current trend system justification theory jost, 2000 ) compensatory stereotypes might lead increased. To masterful female role models a theory within social psychology that system-justifying beliefs serve a psychologically function... Drawing on twenty-five years of research, he provides an accessible account of system justification and... They are both system justifying motives or anti-system justifying motives or anti-system justifying or! Epistemic need for predictability, order, and relational motives to reduce uncertainty, threat, social... Of related forces of his seminal work on system justification theory is a theory within psychology. Simplistic assertion that Whites were superior intellectually, and most decisive political psychologists in aim... Proposed by social psychologists John Jost and Mahzarin Banaji ( 1994 ) of research he! And Mahzarin Banaji ( 1994, Br rating and percentage breakdown by star, we sell... There to foment human support for fair market ideology following a perceived threat the... Dont sell your information to others was not a variable a unified whole leading! Now and can be read on any device with the free Kindle app ideology and brain structures. [ ]... And percentage breakdown by star, we dont share your credit card with... In system justification theory jost fundamentalism motive to maintain a positive group image by generally supporting hierarchical inequality at the group.. Mass of people 's motivation to legitimize the status quo are wide-ranging published, that!
Losartan And Swollen Glands,